Relationship between doping in football and global socioeconomic indicators

  • Rui Camarada Universidade de Évora. Évora. Portugal.
Keywords: Sport Management, Ethic, Doping, Football, Socioeconomic Indicators

Abstract

The aim of this study is to understand the relationship between several global socio-economic indicators and positive cases of doping in soccer in all countries of the world. Methodologically, we use quantitative methods. Through official sources, we collect data from all previously defined socio-economic indicators and positive cases of doping. We performed several statistical procedures, namely descriptive statistics, hypothesis tests, correlations and variance analysis. hrough statistical procedures, we assess that the indicators with the highest averages are the human capital index (65.05) and the corruption index (41.93), meaning that these indicators are the most important for countries. We found that there are more countries without positive cases (n=126) than countries with positive cases of doping (n=58). The Sig (2 extremities) presents a p<0.05, so the Student's t test shows statistically significant differences between all variables analyzed and the number of doping cases, except for the unemployment rate and gini coefficient for a 95% confidence interval. We conclude that the greater the human capital and the perception of corruption, the lower the consumption of doping. We also measured that the higher the HDI and happiness index, the higher the doping consumption. The unemployment rate and gini coefficient did not show any statistical difference.

References

-Abarello, L.; Digneffe, F.; Hiernaux, J.; Maroy, C.; Saint-Georges, P.; Baptista, L. Práticas e métodos de investigação em Ciência Sociais. Lisboa. Portugal. Gradiva.1997.

-Aquino Neto, F.R. O papel do atleta na sociedade e o controle de dopagem no esporte. Revista Brasileira de Medicina no Esporte. Vol. 7. Núm. 4. 138-148. 2001.

-Carravetta. É. Futebol: a formação de times competitivos. Porto Alegre. Brasil. Sulina. 2012.

-Carravetta. É. O enigma da preparação física no futebol. Porto Alegre. Brasil. AGE. 2009.

-De Rose, E.; Nóbrega, A. Drogas Lícitas e Ilícitas. In N. Ghorayeb; T.; Barros, O Exercício: Preparação Fisiológica, Avaliação Médica, Aspetos Especiais e Preventivos. p.395-405. São Paulo. Brasil. Atheneu. 2004.

-Fonseca, J. J. S. Metodologia da pesquisa científica. Fortaleza. Brasil. UEC. 2002.

-Karlmeyer, R.; Fumanga, M.; Toffano, C.; Siqueira, F. Como elaborar um projeto de pesquisa: linguagem e método. Rio de Janeiro. Brasil. FGV. 2007.

-Kinahan, A.; Budgett, R.; Mazzoni, I. Structure and Development of the List of Prohibited Substances and Methods. Medicine and Sport Science. Vol. 62. p.39-54. 2017. Doi:10.1159/000460699.

-Kraay, A. Metodologia para um Índice de Capital Humano do Banco Mundial. 2018. [pdf]. doi: 10.1596 / 1813-9450-8593.

-Lakatos, E. M.; Marconi, M. A. Fundamentos de metodologia científica. São Paulo. Brasil. Atlas. 1991.

-Rodriguez, C. La história del dopaje. História del dopaje, sustancias y procedimientos de control. Vol. 1. CSD. 2008. Retrieved from www.csd.gob.es/csd/estaticos/documentos/52_150.pdf.

-Sakiko, F. The Human Development Paradigm: operationalizing Sen’s ideas on capabilities Feminist Economics. Vol. 9. Núm. 3. 301-317. 2003.

-Serpa, S.A Formação Ética dos Jovens Desportistas - Uma Abordagem Psicológica. In AAVV Ética e Fair Play-novas Perspetivas, novas Exigências,113-137. Lisboa: Confederação do Desporto de Portugal. 2006.

-Thomas, V.; Wang, Y.; Xibo, F. Measuring education inequality - Gini coefficients of education. World Bank Policy, Research working papper. Núm. 2525. 2001.

-Vloet, L. Fair play: menos palavras e mais ação. In Ética e fair play, novas perspetivas, novas exigências, Oeiras, Portugal. Confederação do Desporto de Portugal. 2006.

-WADA. Prohibited list. 2018. Retrieved from: https://www.wadaama.org/sites/default/files/prohibited_list_2018_en.pdf.

-WADA. Código Mundial Antidopagem. 2015. Retrieved from: https://www.wadaama.org/sites/default/files/resources/files/codigo_mundial_antidopagem_2015.pdf.

Published
2021-07-17
How to Cite
Camarada, R. (2021). Relationship between doping in football and global socioeconomic indicators. RBFF - Brazilian Journal of Futsal and Football, 13(52), 60-73. Retrieved from https://www.rbff.com.br/index.php/rbff/article/view/1060
Section
Scientific Articles - Original